I Ching Six-Line Financial Forecasting Experimental Standards and Operating Procedures (Trial)
I. The Necessity of Establishing I Ching Six-Line Financial Experimental Standards and Specifications
Empirical research on I Ching Six-Line financial forecasting aims to draw on the experimental research methods of modern disciplines such as physics, chemistry, and medicine, establish experimental characteristic conditions based on the I Ching Six-Line theory, and through observation, search, statistics, and grouped comparison of actual K-line data in financial markets, explore whether there exist reproducible and verifiable patterns between I Ching Six-Line theory and financial market price movements.
In the course of long-term experimental research, we have accumulated more than twenty years of I Ching Six-Line experimental materials, with approximately 5,000 existing experimental records, laying a certain foundation for further classification research, similar data search, and statistical analysis.
However, relative to the numerous characteristic conditions and their complex combinations involved in I Ching Six-Line theory, the current effective experimental data is still clearly insufficient.
Especially under the strict requirements of a clear Key Line, simple hexagram images, consistent Daily Flow, and similar Moving line characteristics, a set of search conditions can often yield only one to a few similar experiments, and some conditions even have no corresponding data.
At the same time, historical experimental records also suffer from problems such as inconsistent prediction periods, non-standard data formats, differences in market trading hours, and mutual interference among special hexagram characteristics.
These factors not only increase the complexity of experimental statistical analysis but also limit the reproducibility and comparability of research results.
Therefore, it is necessary to refer to the basic methods of modern experimental science and establish a unified set of I Ching Six-Line financial forecasting experimental standards and operating procedures.
Its main objectives include:
- Unify experimental conditions and reduce unnecessary differences between different experiments.
- Standardize the process of I Ching Six-Line hexagram casting, recording, analysis, and data preservation.
- Establish unified classification and search standards for I Ching Six-Line theoretical characteristics.
- Improve the completeness, comparability, and reproducibility of experimental data.
- Through similar data search, grouped comparison, and statistical analysis, explore the consistency between theory and actual movements.
- Establish an evidence grading and uncertainty management mechanism for experimental conclusions, providing traceable reference basis for live trading research.
The core of I Ching Six-Line financial experimentation standardization is to enable experiments conducted at different times, by different personnel, and on different instruments to be compared under clearly defined conditions, and to be subject to independent verification by over the next new data.
II. Standardization of Experimental Subjects and Prediction Periods
1. Clearly Define the Experimental Research Subject
Before the experiment, the Guest should first determine the specific financial market, trading instrument, and prediction target.
For example, commodity futures, stock index futures, or other financial instruments with continuous historical market data.
In principle, one experiment Guest should correspond to Guest one clearly defined research subject, and it is not advisable to arbitrarily change the prediction target or prediction objective after experimental results appear.
Experiments on different trading instruments can establish a unified data format, but during statistical analysis, Guest should pay attention to distinguishing their trading systems, trading sessions, price movement characteristics, and contract continuity.
2. Unify the Prediction Time Period
In order to reduce differences in experimental conditions, it is recommended to use the price movement over five trading days per week as the main standard experimental period for current-stage I Ching Six-Line financial research.
The specific provisions are as follows:
- In principle, hexagram casting should be uniformly conducted on Sunday to predict the movement of the next five trading days.
- The observation window should be determined according to the exchange's actual trading calendar, and natural days should not simply be used in place of trading days.
- The five trading days should be numbered respectively as the 1st to 5th trading days, and the corresponding heavenly stems and earthly branches information for each day should be recorded.
- For trading weeks with statutory holidays, special market closures, or fewer than five trading days, Guest should mark them separately.
- For supplementary experiments conducted on Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday, Guest should clearly define their new prediction starting point and subsequent five trading days, and not directly mix them into statistics with the Sunday standard experiments.
By unifying the prediction window, the correspondence between Daily Flow characteristics and actual K-lines can be improved, and statistical interference caused by different time lengths can be reduced.
It should be noted that five trading days is the standard observation window selected for current research, and it does not mean that this period has been proven to be more effective than other prediction periods.
3. Unify Market Time Standards
Different futures markets may have night sessions, cross-day trading, and exchange time zone differences.
Therefore, all experiments must clearly record:
- The location where the hexagram was cast and the time zone adopted.
- The actual date, time, and corresponding heavenly stems and earthly branches of the hexagram casting.
- The time zone of the exchange location and the rules for dividing trading days.
- Whether there is a night session and which trading day it belongs to.
- The time basis adopted for market data.
Especially for the issue of dividing the day Warm Earth+ when casting hexagrams during Winter Water+ hours, Guest should determine unified rules in advance.
If different Winter Water+ hour day-change methods need to be compared, Guest should record them separately as independent experimental schemes, and cannot arbitrarily choose the method favorable for explaining market movements after observing the results.
III. I Ching Six-Line Hexagram Casting Measurement Standards and Specifications
1. Unify Experimental Questions
Experiments of the same type Guest should adopt a consistent prediction questioning method as much as possible.
For example:
“Measure the price movement of a certain futures instrument over the next five trading days.”
The experimental question Guest should clearly define the prediction object, hexagram casting time, and prediction period, avoiding inconsistent subsequent judgment standards caused by vague descriptions.
2. Standardize Hexagram Casting Methods
For manual coin tossing, computer hexagram casting, and other hexagram casting methods, Guest should separately record the method type and specific operating rules.
For the same hexagram casting method, Guest should maintain a consistent operating procedure as much as possible.
If studying whether different hexagram casting methods have statistical differences, Guest should establish independent experimental groups, and it is not advisable to treat results obtained by different methods as completely identical experimental conditions.
3. Multi-Person Concentrated Divination Experiments
At the stage when data accumulation is insufficient, multiple experimenters can be organized to conduct concentrated experiments around the same trading instrument.
For example, organize multiple experimenters each week to conduct ten or more hexagram casting measurements on the same instrument, in order to increase the opportunity to obtain different hexagram images and characteristic combinations.
This method helps increase the quantity of experimental data collected and may also increase the opportunity to obtain simple hexagram images and searchable characteristics.
But it must be noted:
Different hexagram images obtained from multi-person measurements are not automatically equivalent to mutually independent prediction validations.
If all hexagram images predict the same market and the same trading week, their actual movement results are highly overlapping, and they cannot simply be treated as multiple independent market samples for calculating statistical significance.
During statistics, Guest should separately record the number of hexagram images, the number of independent trading weeks, and the number of independent market observations.
4. One-Person Multiple Hexagram Casting Experiments
Based on current-stage research experience, the experimental method of the same person casting hexagrams multiple times at certain intervals can continue to be explored.
For example, conducting new measurements at intervals of one to two hours within the same day.
However, whether one person casting hexagrams multiple times can provide new effective predictive information should still be Guest treated as an experimental hypothesis to be verified.
Each result must be completely preserved, and statistical differences among results obtained at different intervals, with different measurement counts, and by different personnel should be compared.
It is not permissible to discard other results that do not meet expectations simply because an easily interpretable hexagram image appeared in repeated hexagram casting.
5. Completely Record All Experiments
In principle, all experiments conforming to pre-determined hexagram casting rules Guest should be preserved.
Including:
- Simple hexagram images and complex hexagram images.
- Hexagram images with Moving lines and without Moving lines.
- Hexagram images with a clearly identifiable Key Line and those where the Key Line cannot yet be clearly identified.
- Hexagram images for which similar data can be found and those with no search results.
- Experiments where theory and market movements are consistent, inconsistent, and undeterminable.
It is not permitted to enter only hexagram images with correct judgments, matching movements, or easy interpretation into the formal database.
IV. Specifications for Analyzing I Ching Six-Line Theoretical Characteristics
1. Standards for Determining the Key Line
Selecting the Key Line is an important part of I Ching Six-Line financial forecasting analysis, and it is also one of the fundamental issues still disputed in current research.
For Key Line selection methods in different theories, Guest should clearly establish corresponding experimental rules.
The same research scheme must maintain consistent Key Line selection standards, avoiding temporary modification of the Key Line due to different actual market results.
For hexagram images where the Key Line cannot be determined, Guest should mark them as “Key Line to be determined” and preserve their complete data.
If different Key Line selection schemes need to be compared, comparative research can be conducted under the same historical data conditions, and independent samples can be used to test the results.
2. Prioritize Research on Simple Hexagram Images
Considering the current scale of experimental data and the maturity of theoretical research, it is recommended to prioritize analysis at the current stage of hexagram images with relatively clear characteristics and fewer interfering factors, including:
- Hexagram images with one Moving line.
- Hexagram images in the Static Hexagram that contain clear Hidden Movement characteristics.
- Hexagram images in the Static Hexagram that contain special theoretical characteristics.
- A small number of multiple Moving line hexagram images with clear dominant characteristics.
This choice helps reduce the complexity of initial research and improve the interpretability of experimental conditions.
However, Guest should clearly define the criteria for determining simple hexagram images before analysis, and completely preserve Hot Earth- complex hexagram images entering the main research group.
It is not permissible to exclude a complex hexagram image afterward simply because it does not meet expected results.
3. Establish a Unified Characteristic Classification System
Each hexagram image Guest should at least extract characteristics according to the following categories:
- Key Line characteristics: Key Line five elements, six relatives, prosperity and decline, Void, monthly destruction, etc.
- Moving line characteristics: Moving line position, quantity, five-element attributes, relationship with the Key Line, and transformed line characteristics.
- Month and day characteristics: The generating, overcoming, clashing, and combining relationships between the monthly establishment, day Warm Earth+, and the Key Line and Moving lines.
- Daily Flow characteristics: The earthly branches of the five trading days, and the interaction relationships between each Daily Flow and the main hexagram lines.
- Special theoretical characteristics: exiting void, clashing void, filling void, combining destruction, entering tomb, etc.
- Overall hexagram image characteristics: The original hexagram, changed hexagram, Self Guest relationship, and other clearly recorded structural information.
All characteristics Guest should use unified names, unified judgment conditions, and unified data fields, facilitating future database queries and statistical analysis.
4. Handling Characteristic Conflicts
In some hexagram images, several different or even mutually contradictory theoretical characteristics may exist simultaneously.
For such hexagram images, Guest should completely record all characteristics, clearly identify the source of conflict, and mark them as “multiple characteristics to be verified.”
Before Hot Earth- establishing characteristic priority through experiments, it is not advisable to determine that a certain characteristic must necessarily take priority based only on individual cases.
Independent experimental groups can be established for characteristic conflicts, gradually studying the applicable scope of different conditions.
V. Specifications for Experimental Data Collection and Preservation
1. Establish Unified Experimental Records
It is recommended that each experimental record contain at least the following information:
| Data Category | Standard Record Content |
|---|---|
| Basic information | Experiment number, measurement personnel, hexagram casting method |
| Time information | Hexagram casting time, time zone, heavenly stems and earthly branches, prediction period |
| Market information | Exchange, instrument, contract, trading session |
| Hexagram image information | Original hexagram, changed hexagram, six relatives, Self Guest, Moving lines |
| Theoretical characteristics | Key Line, prosperity and decline, generating and overcoming, clashing and combining, Fulfillment Timing |
| Actual movement | Open, high, low, close, rise and fall range, K-line pattern |
| Experimental conclusion | Consistent, inconsistent, partially consistent, pending |
| Data status | Completeness, abnormal situations, data version |
2. Standardize K-line Data
Financial market K-lines are the main observational basis for experimental results, and Guest should ensure that their sources are clear, calculation rules are consistent, and historical records are traceable.
For futures markets, it is necessary to specifically explain the main contract, continuous contract, adjustment or price adjustment method, and the handling rules for contract rollover.
At the same time, original market data should be preserved to avoid the inability to reproduce experimental results due to subsequent historical revisions by data providers.
3. Standardize Special Experimental Data
For the following situations, special data markers must be added:
- The actual observation time is less than five trading days.
- The trading week includes statutory holidays.
- The experiment occurred midweek.
- There are different calculation bases for the day Warm Earth+ of hexagram casting during Winter Water+ hours.
- The market has night sessions or cross-day trading.
- Contract rollover or abnormal market movements occur.
- There are missing fields in historical records.
These experiments Guest should not be arbitrarily deleted, but Guest should be clearly distinguished in the main standard experimental statistics, and studied as independent groups when necessary.
4. Establish Data Quality Grading
It is recommended to divide experimental data into three levels:
Level A: Standard experimental data
Hexagram casting information is complete, trading periods are unified, heavenly stems and earthly branches are clear, theoretical characteristics are clear, and complete corresponding K-line data is available.
Level B: Usable data with differences
Main information is complete, but there are identifiable differences in prediction period, trading session, or other conditions.
Level C: Data to be verified
There are missing key fields, unclear timing, Key Line disputes, or data quality issues.
Level A data is prioritized for main statistical analysis under strict conditions; Level B data can be used for grouped research; Level C data is retained for material verification and subsequent research.
The data levels here only indicate the standardization and completeness of records, and do not indicate that a certain hexagram image itself has a higher prediction accuracy rate.
VI. Specifications for Searching and Statistics of Similar Experimental Data
1. Establish a Layered Search Mechanism
Based on the current database scale, it is recommended to use a step-by-step screening method to search for similar historical experiments.
First layer: Core condition search
Prioritize considering whether the Key Line, key Moving lines, and main I Ching Six-Line theoretical characteristics are consistent.
Second layer: Daily Flow condition search
Further compare the trading period and the heavenly stems and earthly branches, generating and overcoming, and clashing and combining relationships of key Daily Flows.
Third layer: Overall hexagram image condition search
When necessary, further compare the original hexagram, changed hexagram, hexagram name, and other structural characteristics.
Among these, the same hexagram name and the same Daily Flow can serve as key research conditions, but their actual predictive value still needs to be tested through control data.
The stricter the search conditions, the higher the degree of similarity may be, but the number of search results is usually smaller.
Therefore, it is necessary to establish reasonable research rules between characteristic similarity and sample quantity.
2. Strictly Record the Search Process
Each search Guest should preserve the following information:
- The characteristic conditions used.
- The search date and database version.
- The number of experiments meeting the conditions.
- The number of independent trading periods participating in the statistics.
- The actual market movements of similar experiments.
- Condition adjustments and reasons for adjustment.
If the first search does not yield sufficient results, exploratory analysis after relaxing conditions can be conducted, but the original search conditions must be preserved, and the new results must be reported separately from the original results.
It is not permissible to continuously modify conditions until statistical results meeting expectations appear, and only then identify that condition as an effective pattern.
3. Standardize the Use of Small-Sample Results
Under current strict search conditions, often only one to a few historical experiments can be found.
For such results, Guest should treat them as research clues, not as already confirmed statistical patterns.
It is recommended to establish the following operational classifications:
- 1–4 records: Individual case observation group.
- 5–19 records: Preliminary exploration group.
- 20 records and above: Sample basis sufficient for further statistical analysis.
The above groupings are only data management recommendations, not criteria for determining statistical significance. Whether there is sufficient evidence still Guest should be judged in combination with the number of independent samples, actual effect Guest, confidence intervals, and verification methods.
4. Establish Grouped Comparison Standards
When discovering that a certain I Ching Six-Line characteristic may have a corresponding relationship with market movements, Guest should set up an appropriate control group.
For example, when studying the relationship between a certain Key Line and Daily Flow, experiments with that characteristic can be compared with experiments without that characteristic, and the natural rise and fall background of the same market and same time interval should be considered.
At the same time, Guest should pay attention to sample correlation caused by different trading instruments, market phases, and repeated hexagram casting.
For new patterns discovered in searches, Guest should retain independent over the next experimental samples for verification, and Guest should not use only the same batch of data that discovered the pattern to prove its effectiveness.
VII. Standards for Verifying Consistency Between I Ching Six-Line Theory and Actual Movements
1. Clearly Define Theoretical Judgments
Before observing over the next market movements, Guest should transform theoretical derivations into specific testable judgments.
For example, whether a certain Daily Flow corresponds to a clear directional change, whether a certain Fulfillment Timing corresponds to a pre-defined price turning point, or whether a certain hexagram image characteristic corresponds to a specific K-line performance.
Only by clearly defining the judgment content in advance can subjective bias caused by post-hoc interpretation be reduced.
2. Unify Standards for Judging Actual Movements
It is necessary to clearly define what indicators are used to evaluate market movements.
For example:
- The direction of rise or fall of the closing price relative to the previous closing price.
- The price range and amplitude of the day.
- The time when the intraday high and low prices occur.
- Pre-defined trend turning conditions.
- Whether the specified Daily Flow exhibits predetermined market movement characteristics.
For details such as upper and lower shadows, turning times, and special K-line patterns, Guest should also clearly define in advance the judgment methods and allowable error ranges.
3. Establish Consistency Records
Each experiment can be recorded as:
Consistent: Actual movements conform to pre-determined theoretical judgment conditions.
Inconsistent: Actual movements do not conform to pre-determined judgment conditions.
Partially consistent: Only some of multiple predetermined judgments hold true, and each item is recorded individually.
Undeterminable: Due to missing data, unclear judgment rules, or other reasons, effective evaluation cannot be completed.
During statistics, Guest should separately report the proportions of different results and the number of undeterminable cases, and Guest should not automatically exclude undeterminable cases and then claim a higher accuracy rate.
4. Strengthen Daily Flow Fulfillment Timing Research
Daily Flow Fulfillment Timing is one of the important topics in I Ching Six-Line short-cycle financial research.
For theoretical conditions such as Void, monthly destruction, and clashing and combining that may have multiple Fulfillment Timings, Guest should simultaneously record all pre-specified Fulfillment Timing windows.
Focus on observing the actual performance of different Fulfillment Timings, and whether there is a stable temporal sequence relationship.
For example, the Fulfillment Timing phenomena of the first two trading days and subsequent trading days can be classified and statistically analyzed, to study whether after the appearance of an early Fulfillment Timing, subsequent Fulfillment Timings still have independent explanatory or predictive value.
For such patterns, Guest should continuously test through newly added experiments, avoiding determining universal laws based only on individual phenomena already observed.
VIII. Supplementary Experiments and Intraday Calibration Under Conditions of Insufficient Data
Under the current situation of limited data scale and some theories still being immature, a supplementary research mechanism can be established to increase experimental information, but Guest should not thereby lower evidence standards.
1. Multi-Person Concentrated Measurement
Organize multiple people to conduct standardized measurements on the same instrument, increasing the types of hexagram images and characteristic combinations available for observation.
Uniformly archive all results, and evaluate whether there are reproducible differences in the predictive performance of different experimenters.
2. Repeated Measurement by the Same Person at Intervals
Allow repeated experiments according to pre-determined time intervals, but all results must be recorded, and it is not permitted to retain only the most easily interpretable hexagram images.
Repeated measurement Guest should be treated as an independent research topic, testing whether it can provide new information beyond the first measurement.
3. Midweek Supplementary Measurement
For trading observations completed from Wednesday to Friday, new experiments targeting the subsequent five trading days can be conducted after market close.
Such experiments can be used to study prediction continuity and the relationship between different time windows.
However, midweek experiments must independently record their starting point and cannot directly replace the Sunday standard experiments.
4. Dynamic Observation Based on Actual Market Movements
During the trading process, further classified observation of similar historical experiments can be conducted in combination with the market movements of the first few hours or one to two trading days that have already occurred.
For example, compare whether the movement of the first two days in historical cases is similar to the current market, and what result distribution exists in the subsequent few trading days.
This method can be used to establish dynamic conditional prediction research.
However, Guest should particularly distinguish:
Using already occurred market movements to update judgments is a new conditional prediction method and cannot serve as proof of the accuracy of the original prediction.
Predictions after intraday calibration Guest should newly record the publication time, the data range used, and the subsequent market interval requiring verification, and use independent historical tests or over the next experiments to evaluate their effectiveness.
5. Observe K-line Details and Probability Distributions
For similar historical experiments, statistics can continue to be collected on upper and lower shadows, time periods when highs and lows occur, key Daily Flows, movement amplitude, and K-line patterns.
These data help describe the market movement characteristics in similar cases.
But only when the sample quantity is sufficient, the rules are stable, and independent verification has been conducted can they be further evaluated for whether they have actual predictive value.
IX. The Boundary Between Experimental Research and Live Trading
I Ching Six-Line financial research can use real market data to conduct experiments, and can also observe the execution performance of trading strategies under risk-controlled conditions.
However, between experimental results and actual trading decisions, Guest should establish a clear risk isolation mechanism.
Especially when the following situations currently exist:
- Insufficient similar historical data.
- The Key Line is still Hot Earth- clear.
- Contradictions exist among theoretical characteristics.
- Key Fulfillment Timings lack repeated verification.
- Different measurement hexagram images give inconsistent information.
- The prediction method is still Hot Earth- tested through independent samples.
Guest should not directly use a certain hexagram image or a small number of similar historical cases as deterministic trading signals.
It is recommended to proceed in the following order:
Historical experimental research → Independent sample testing → Simulated trading verification → Small-scale controlled live observation → Continuous evaluation
In simulated and live research, Guest should determine in advance the trading instrument, entry conditions, exit conditions, maximum allowable loss, margin risk, and suspension rules, and completely record transaction costs, slippage, and actual execution differences.
For I Ching Six-Line theoretical conditions that cannot be confirmed, it is permissible to retain experimental results of “no effective judgment” or “not participating in trading.”
Guest should not, in order to maintain trading frequency, create trading bases by repeatedly casting hexagrams, relaxing search conditions, or adjusting theoretical interpretations after the fact.
X. Experimental Review and Continuous Improvement Mechanism
In order to ensure that the research process is traceable, it is recommended to establish a regular review system.
1. Weekly Experiment Archiving
Centrally verify hexagram casting records, K-lines of the five trading days, theoretical judgments, and actual movements, and mark abnormal data.
2. Monthly Classified Statistics
Conduct classified statistics according to Key Line, Moving lines, hexagram names, Daily Flow characteristics, and special theoretical conditions.
At the same time, check data differences among different personnel, different instruments, and different trading periods.
3. Regular Independent Verification
Test candidate patterns already discovered using new experimental data.
Report historical exploration results and independent verification results separately to avoid confusion.
4. Experimental Rule Version Management
When Key Line selection rules, characteristic definitions, K-line processing methods, or Fulfillment Timing judgment standards change, Guest should preserve the original version.
Old and new methods should be statistically analyzed separately, and results obtained under different rules cannot be directly mixed to calculate accuracy rates.
5. Preserve Counterevidence and Abnormal Cases
For experiments inconsistent with traditional theory, Guest should enjoy the same data preservation and review standards as consistent cases.
Research not only needs to discover patterns that may hold, but also needs to identify theoretical hypotheses that do not hold, are unstable, or hold only under specific conditions.
Conclusion
The long-term goal of I Ching Six-Line financial forecasting experimental research is to draw on the methods of modern experimental science and gradually establish an empirical research system based on I Ching Six-Line theoretical characteristics, using financial K-lines as the observational basis, historical similar data search as the research tool, and statistical comparison and independent repeated verification as the testing means.
At the current stage when experimental data is still insufficient and some theoretical relationships are still unclear, the importance of standardization and normalization is especially prominent.
By unifying experimental periods, standardizing hexagram casting procedures, establishing characteristic classification, improving data records, and strengthening grouped comparison and independent verification, interference caused by differences in data conditions and human interpretation can be gradually reduced.
At the same time, methods such as multi-person measurement, repeated hexagram casting, midweek supplementary experiments, and intraday market calibration still need to be tested through strict experiments for their added information value, and the number of measurements or the degree of match with historical cases cannot replace effectiveness verification.
Experimental standardization is the foundation of data accumulation, characteristic structuring is the foundation of similar search, statistical comparison is the tool for discovering patterns, and independent repeated verification is an important basis for testing whether a theory can hold.
I Ching Six-Line financial research Guest should be premised on long-term, objective, and complete data accumulation, valuing both cases consistent with theoretical expectations and facing up to inconsistent and unexplainable experimental results.
Through continuous research, gradually clarify the actual performance and applicable scope of different I Ching Six-Line theoretical conditions in financial markets, providing an empirical foundation for establishing a more standardized and reviewable new I Ching Six-Line financial hexagram interpretation model.
Comments